New Delhi [India], June 7 (ANI): The Rouse Avenue Court on Thursday recorded the statement of the doctor who issued a medical certificate to the complainant whose both hands were fractured during the anti-Sikh riots of 1984. He opined that the nature of injuries was grievous.
This matter pertains to two cases of riots in the Janak Puri and Vikas Puri areas in 1984. The court had discharged former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar from the offence of murder.
Special judge (MP-MLA cases) Kaveri Baweja recorded the statement of Dr Rakesh Kumar Sharma who on November 15, 1984, at Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital issued a medical certificate to Harvinder Singh Kohli who was the complainant in one of the cases.
Dr. Sharma said that on November 15, 1984, he issued a medical certificate to Harvinder Singh Kohli and mentioned in it that his Right and left hands were fractured and his right shoulder too. Based on the medical certificate, he opined the nature of the injuries was grievous.
The court had discharged Sajjan Kumar on August 23. The trial will proceed for other offences related to rioting etc.
The Janakpuri case pertains to the killing of two Sikhs, Sohan Singh and his son-in-law Avtar Singh, on November 1, 1984. And second case was registered in Vikaspuri police station related to the burning of Gurcharan Singh on November 2, 1984.
The Court had framed Charges against Sajjan Kumar under sections of IPC 147 (Punishment for rioting), 148 (Rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (offence is committed by any member of unlawful assembly in prosecution of the common object of that assembly), 153 (promoting enmity between different groups), 295 (Injuring or defiling place of worship, with intent to insult the religion of any class), 307 (attempt of murder), 308 (Attempt to commit culpable homicide), 323 (deals with punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 395 (Punishment for Dacoity) and 426 (Punishment for mischief) etc.
However, the court ordered to discharge him for the offences U/S 302 (Punishment for Murder) and 325 (Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The Special court while ordering the framing of charges stated that “this court is of prima facie view that the oral and documentary evidence placed on record by the prosecution is sufficient to hold that an unlawful assembly or mob consisting of hundreds of persons and armed with deadly weapons like dandas, iron rods, bricks and stones etc. had gathered near the Gurudwara situated in Gulab Bagh, Nawada on November 1, 1984.
The court had noted that the accused Sajjan Kumar was also a part of the said mob and the common object of the said mob was to put the above-mentioned Gurudwara on fire and to burn and loot the articles lying therein and also to burn and destroy the houses of Sikhs situated in the said locality, to damage, destroy or loot their articles or property and to kill the Sikhs residing in that locality, to avenge killing of the then Prime Minister Smt. Indira Gandhi.
Hence, a prima facie case is held to be made out against the accused/Sajjan Kumar for the commission of the offences punishable U/Ss 147/148/149/153A/295/307/308/323/325/395/436 IPC and charges are accordingly directed to be framed against him for the said offences. Further, in the alternative, a charge for the offence of abetment defined by Section 107 IPC and made punishable by Section 109 r/w 114 IPC about the above-said offences is also directed to be framed against the accused as the accused being principal abettor was present at the scene of the crime, when the offences abetted by him were committed by the other unknown offenders.
However, as far as the offences committed during the incident dated November 2, 1984, which relate to the murder of Sohan Singh and Avtar Singh at the hands of members of the mob or crowd, which had gathered on that date near or outside the Congress party office in Uttam Nagar, and also the injuries suffered by complainant Harvinder Singh in the said incident, are concerned, the accused is being discharged for the offences U/S 302 and 325 IPC respectively committed in the said incident for the reasons already discussed in this order, court said.
Advo Anil Sharma, S A Hashmi and Anuj Sharma appeared for Sajjan Kumar in the matter. (ANI)
Disclaimer: This story is auto-generated from a syndicated feed of ANI; only the image & headline may have been reworked by News Services Division of World News Network Inc Ltd and Palghar News and Pune News and World News
HINDI, MARATHI, GUJARATI, TAMIL, TELUGU, BENGALI, KANNADA, ORIYA, PUNJABI, URDU, MALAYALAM
For more details and packages
